Saturday, September 22, 2007

Band Wagons or "the latest treatment"

It is reasonable to fear psychiatrists that just prescribe medications and those that won't. Patients deserve to be treated for what works best rather than a psychiatrists therapeutic preference. A recent article in the American Journal of Psychiatry talked about Benjamin Rush, the father of American psychiatry. Dr. Rush was the only physician to sign the declaration of Independence and also the Constitution. He was a great doctor and a great American. During the Yellow Fever epidemic in Philadelphia, Dr. Rush stayed behind to save people's lives. Unfortunately, his primary treatment was a common one of that time called blood-letting. Even though this treatment was ultimately ineffective, Dr. Rush prescribed it even for himself. He survived thankfully although it reinforced his conviction. The point of this story is that after WWII, psychiatry believed that psychoanalysis was the treatment for everything. In the 1950's, we started to prescribe effective medications for many psychiatric maladies. The biological psychiatry revolution has been truly helpful for many patients. Unfortunately, many medications are only effective with some kind of talking therapy. At present, many neuro-scientists are using Freudian insights to guide their biological and genetic investigations. As one of my insightful psychiatry colleagues has admonished, "for all the psychiatrists who proudly proclaim they don't so psychotherapy, shame on you. For all the psychiatrists that proudly proclaim they only do psychotherapy and never prescribe pills, shame on you." Thankfully, most of us do both psychotherapy and medication management or at least insist that patients on medication need the addition of psychotherapy. Band-wagons could be a reasonable perspective for researchers as they need to focus and pursue their ideas with passion. Clinicians need to provide the people who are desperate for help the best treatments available, not what they have the most training in, or their "favorite approach." I get excited about new treatments and always hope they'll work. The ideal care however, is guided by science and at the same time open minded. That is certainly the case in psychiatry and psychology when all the answers are still not in. We know a tremendous amount when it comes to people, although we still have lots to learn, as in every branch of medicine. If you think otherwise or agree, let us know.

6 comments:

inthebackrow said...

I think that this blog entry outlines a treatment perspective that is very hard to actually obtain. I have bipolar disorder and my understanding of psychiatry and psychology is limited to that of the patient, and what broad spectrum truths I have managed to derrive from my private and proffessional life.

It is my understanding that the field of psychiatry is ever expanding and the rate of new knowledge about pharmaceuticals and psychotherapy is comparable to advancements in other fields. The act of "keeping up" with the latest treatment options as well as "keeping current" on changes to existing treatments must be very difficult and I would suggest that most therapists and doctors would have to somehow choose their filters and determine which information from which sources they will review.

From an informed patients perspective, it is totally necessary to be aware of your "helpers' perspective and unfortunately totally necessary to understand your options in the broad spectrum of it all. The nature of this beast is that the patient, already judged as a person of unreliable judgement, has to be their own doctor, therapist and advocate at times.

There is enormous value in those that help us having their strengths and passions but again, these strengths can only be utilized fully and in an informed way by an informed and capable patient.

I guess this is where I might propose that I agree with your statements with the disclaimer that I feel that what you say does apply to the front line mental health practitioners. Those individuals who take the refferal from the general practitioner or recruit their clients from the general public.

I think many of us would like to think that the first person we see can point us in the right direction instead of possibly, mistakingly encouraging us into conformity with their limited ideas.

The reality is that the perfect world does not exist so I think all I ask is that proffesionals in the field of mental health know enough to identify when their approach isn't working or won't work and have a good enough network of alternatives to provide the client with solid, reasonable choices.

I am currently not medicated and have undergone three and half years of very focussed psychotherapy and group therapy. I am dilegent and persistant and the results are amazing. This option was not encouraged by my psychiatrist. My front line GP pointed me in the right direction with my therapist. She knew enough that there was an option other than medication and had listened to her patients and made a good referral. Amazingly that is all she needed to know in this case.

psychchat said...

Thanks for your insightful comment and very glad to hear that you are doing well. I agree that the demands on keeping up is difficult although it makes our work more interesting and also rewarding. Because of the size of the problem, it is best shared with the person we serve. Informed patients are patients that can bes t collaborate in their care. If you see someone that treats you with the respect you deserve, then you ahve found someone that can help you. There may be disagreements with your care provider, but they must realize that your perspective is important. The patient also needs to treat the care giver as someone who has studied the field and other patients. It is almo0st liek we are the experts in climbing mountains and the patient knows the mountain. The more care is seen as becoming informed of the options and respect for decisions taken, the better. Thanks again for your comment and I love the name inthebackrow as that is where I sat in medical school.

inthebackrow said...

Inthebackrow is where I hung out all through university. Mostly because I couldn't rely on myself to be consistant enough to sit up front and be watched.

From the back row you gain perspective......

averagejoe said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
averagejoe said...

jn

jims said...

Dr. Gorman

Please let me know how to contact you. I would like you to meet with my 17 year old son with Asparger's Syndrome who lives with me in RSF.

Jim Stroesser
P: 714-852-2115